Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia 1.0 Projects (talk)(FAQ)
WP 1.0 bot list (talk) — (stats)
Selection bot — (talk) Version 0.7 bot selection VersionIDs — 0.7 Badwords Version 0.7 feedback
IRC channel (IRC)
Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.8 release (manual selection) (t) (Nominations) (t) [You can help]
"Selection" project (Talk) 2008 schools selection
CORE TOPICS CORE SUPPLEMENT Core topics - 1,000 (Talk) (COTF) (bot)
TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
Schools project (Talk)|
WORK VIA WIKI PROJECTS (talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)
Static content subcom.

Shortcuts: WT:1.0 WT:1

If you are new to this page, please see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAQs.

Please report any bugs with Version 0.5 on the new bugs page.

Core topics discussions – Wiki sort discussions – FAs first discussions – Work via WikiProjects discussions – Pushing to 1.0 discussions

Contents 1 Archives 2 Proposed addition to assessment table 3 GA Reassessment of George Washington 4 Question 5 Possible issue 6 Offline reader for mobile devices

[edit] Archives

• /Archive 1
• /Objections archive
• /Archive 2
• /Archive 3
• /Archive 4 Sep - Dec 2005
• /Archive 5
• /Archive 6
• /Archive 7
• /Archive 8
• /Archive 9
• /Archive 10 29 May - 31 Jul 2006
• /Archive 11 1 Aug - 23 Aug 2006
• /Archive 12 24 Aug - 31 Aug 2006
• /Archive 13 Sep & Oct 2006
• /Archive 14 Nov 2006 - March 2007
• /Archive 15 March 2007–Dec 2007
• /Archive 16 2008
• /Archive 17

[edit] Proposed addition to assessment table

I have propsed it here. Crash Underride 16:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] GA Reassessment of George Washington

I have done a GA Reassessment of the George Washington article as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to need work on referencing. My review is here. I am notifying all the interested projects that this article is on hold for a week pending work that needs to be done. I don't think it will require too much to satisfy the GA Criteria and I sincerely hope that someone will step forward and take this project on. It would be a shame to delist what is in all senses but one, a good article. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 21:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Question

This may not be the proper place to ask, and if that is true, could you direct me to where I could ask? Where would I go to find the number of articles that were under the provenance of one WikiProject at this time last year, so one could see how many new articles have been added to the project in the meanwhile? Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Possible issue

The most recent edition of the logs of changes in the philosophy wikiproject have been listing every article, rather than just changes. See June 15:

Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Metaphysics_articles_by_quality_log

Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Medieval_philosophy_articles_by_quality_log

Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! London Transport had the same problem, I think. Looks like the bot developed a bug. It happened once before, a year or two back. Cheers, Walkerma (talk) 19:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

It was apparently caused by some kind of reconfiguration of the servers; CBM is looking into the problem, which apparently messed up at least one other bot also. Walkerma (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Offline reader for mobile devices

I browsed through the archives but could not find an answer. Is there any ongoing effort to create an open source mobile version of Wikipedia 0.x for mobile devices such as Android and iPhone? Such devices are often taking in the subway, where no Internet connection is available, and not everybody can afford to pay for a mobile Internet connection. So an offline copy of Wikipedia would be great, and Version 0.x is much more adapted than the whole Wikipedia for such devices with rather limited storage. A very portable way to produce this would just simple HTML files and a static thematic index: Using the device's HTML browser means there is no software to develop. A more evolved version could include searching and compression, but that would require device-specific development. I am sure this is not a new idea, could anyone point me to a place where people are building this (open source) ? Cheers Nicolas1981 (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I don't know of anything. We're even struggling with the standard offline release right now, because our publisher is no longer offering the reader software as open source. I think it would be a fantastic project, but it would need someone to coordinate it on WP (could you do it?). I will be going to Wikimania this year, I'll try and fish the waters to find a software company that could & would do this. I'll also talk to User:Kelson on the French Wikipedia, since we work a lot together. Walkerma (talk) 06:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)