Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military science task force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the Military science task force of the Military history WikiProject! The task force coordinators are Nick-D (talk) and MBK004 (talk).
Contents |
[edit] Scope
This task force covers topics related to military science, including strategy, tactics, doctrines, and military theory in general. (Please note that this is not the same thing as the role of science in the military, which is generally covered by the Military technology and engineering task force.)
[edit] Participants
Please remember to also add your name to the main list of project members if you are not yet listed there. This list will be updated periodically and editors who have not edited Wikipedia for six months will be removed. If your name is not here, please simply add it again.
- BusterD (talk · contribs) (This task force was partially at my suggestion, so if you didn't like the idea, blame me. Interested in military action as communication from pre-history to the latest moment.)
- Chewygum (talk · contribs)
- Cyclopaedic (talk · contribs) (WW2, medieval English warfare, artillery, warplanes, tactics, behaviour of men under fire, dabbling)
- Dryzen (talk · contribs) (Mostly Medieval, Early-Modern and Byzantine.)
- Gw099 (talk · contribs) (Cold War and Modern Era Military Doctrines, tactics, and Strategies)
- Hcberkowitz (talk · contribs) (C3I with emphasis on intelligence, special operations, CBRN)
- KingPenguin (talk · contribs) (19th century and World War II)
- Malin Tokyo (talk · contribs) (Military history, tactics and organization with focus on army matters)
- MLWilson (talk · contribs) (Primarily the structure and organization of United States military organizations, particularly combatant commands and the intelligence community, and the theory of network-centric warfare/operations)
- mrg3105 (talk · contribs) (I'm the one who just discovered and created the article Offensive (military), and hope to Wikify a few related articles. My interest is primarily at the operational level)
- The Land (talk · contribs) (especially the doctrine, strategy and tactics of navies from 1847 to 1945 and armies from 1895 to 1945.)
- Tomas_e (talk · contribs) (Contemporary military thinking, strategy, military theory, strategic planning, military operational analysis)
- Suyogaerospace (talk · contribs) (Aircraft, Electronic warfare, NBC warfare, Military communication, New Technology in Armed Forces,Indian Technology)
[edit] Tagging and assessment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Any article related to this task force should be marked by adding Science-task-force=yes to the {{WPMILHIST}} project banner at the top of its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). This will automatically place it into Category:Military science task force articles.
[edit] Templates
- For main project templates, see the main project page.
[edit] Categories
[edit] To-do
- Article alerts
- Featured list candidates
- 2 Jul 2009 – Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps (talk) is promoted to FL status.
- Good article nominations
- 26 Jun 2009 – 2009 North Korean nuclear test (talk) is nominated as GA candidate by Bsimmons666.
Other news
- 8 July 2009 – A new database dump is available. The cleanup listings from WolterBot should be updated.
- 29 June 2009 – A compilation of Academic Journal has been generated from the |journal= parameter found in citation templates, identifying the 500 most cited journals, and 500 most cited journals without articles.
- 18 June 2009 – A new database dump is available. The cleanup listings from WolterBot should be updated.
- 15 June 2009 – A new edition of the Wikipedia Signpost is out.
- 30 Apr 2009 – WikiProjects can sign up for Announcements & Milestones, listing the milestones of a particular projects (such as 10th FA, etc...). The list is managed by LivingBot.
- Attention needed
- ...to referencing and citation (266) • ...to coverage and accuracy (127) • ...to structure (50) • ...to grammar (17) • ...to supporting materials (151)
- Popular pages
- Full list
- Cleanup needed
- Military science
- Requested articles
- Airborne rappelling • Alpine regiment • Alpine troops • Artillery officer • Battlefield communications • Battlefield information manager • Black Reconnaissance • Blind fighting • Brushfire war • Cloak fighting • Combat high • Combat trauma • Cornicine • Crémaillère • Economics of warfare • Electronic Protection Measures • High-altitude combat • Insertion skills • Liaison officer • Line Function Concept • Military bureaucracy • Military linguistics • Military markings • Military reform • Military sociology • Military surgeon • Mobile Observation Team • Nuclear monopoly • Ordinance Company • Penal regiment • Political warfare • Principal Medical Officer • Regimental standard • Royal bodyguard • Ship's officer • Sonic deception • Soviet Military Encyclopedia • Strategic defeat • Strongpoint • Tactical defeat • Tactical victory • War paint • Warrant Ordnance Officer • Troop Readiness • Combat Readiness
- Expansion needed
- Military theory • Military doctrine • Force multiplier • Economy of force • Tactical formation • Veteran's pension • Boarding (attack) • Cadet officer • Decoys and dummies • Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield • Military brothel • Officer training • Post-Apocalyptic scenarios • Presentation of the flag • Strategic victory • Time On Target • Tribal warrior • War dance
To transclude this list, use {{WPMILHIST Announcements/Military science}}
- Tag articles!
- Expand on Soviet theory of military doctrine, a very different idea from most western concepts of the same thing
- Expand info on all military doctirne, some more info on Shock and Awe and British Doctrine would be appreciated.
- Expand info on how US National Guard units figure into the newly reorganizing US Army warfighting capabilities.
- Add things here!
[edit] Resources
[edit] Annotated bibliography
Please use the following format when adding works:
* <!-- bibliographical infomation --> ** Content: *** <!-- optional content summary --> ** Reviews: *** <!-- commentary on work by historians & other reputable sources --> ** Editor comments: *** <!-- personal commentary by editors -->
- Add things here!

