Welcome to mapoid.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Calvinism/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Calvinism
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 1 1 1 6
Good article GA 1 2 3
B 12 13 29 15 18 87
C 13 7 22 7 8 57
Start 7 11 53 81 183 335
Stub 1 5 21 71 267 365
List 2 4 6
Assessed 36 36 128 176 483 859
Unassessed 2 1 167 170
Total 36 36 130 177 650 1029

Welcome to the assessment department of the Calvinism WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Calvinism-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPCalvinism/Article Scope}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Calvinism articles by quality and Category:Calvinism articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

[edit] Simple howto

[edit] The basic process

  • Find an article to assess (see below)
  • Assess it according to the assessment criteria (see below, under Instructions)
  • Enter your findings in the template on the talk page (see Article Scope Template on WikiProject Calvinism)

[edit] Finding an article to assess: the tagging process

There are a variety of ways of finding an article to tag. These include:

[edit] Templates

[edit] Article Scope Template

If you see an article that should belong to this project but doesn't, please go to its talk page and add

{{WPCalvinism/Article Scope|class=|importance=}}

to the top of the Talk page. This creates a box that looks like

WikiProject Calvinism  
Calvinism portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Calvinism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Calvinism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Unrated ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

from Template:WPCalvinism/Article Scope

[edit] Stub template

To mark an article as a stub, add the following at the bottom:

{{Calvinism-stub}}

to their page. This creates a box that looks like

 This Calvinism-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

from Template:Calvinism-stub

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Calvinism WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

[edit] Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Calvinism}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Calvinism | ... | class= ??? | ... }}
Featured article FA 
A-Class article A 
Good article GA 
B-Class article B 
C-Class article C 
Start-Class article Start 
Stub-Class article Stub 

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article:

Featured list FL 
List-Class article List 
Disambiguation page Disambig 
 Portal 
Project page Project 
Redirect page Redirect 
Template page Template 
Category page Category 
Media file page Image 
Non-article page NA 
Unrated ??? 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The class parameter should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Calvinism articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

[edit] Quality scale

WikiProject article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
Featured article FA  The article has attained featured article status. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Tourette Syndrome
(as of March 2009)
Featured list FL  The article has attained featured list status. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3)
(as of February 2009)
A-Class article A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help. Batman (1989 film)
(as of October 2008)
Good article GA  The article has attained good article status. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Usain Bolt
(as of May 2009)
B-Class article B  The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style and related style guidelines. Jammu and Kashmir
(as of September 2007)
C-Class article C  The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues. Exeter Cathedral
(as of June 2008)
Start-Class article Start  An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation. Real analysis
(as of November 2006)
Stub-Class article Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. Cuthwine
(as of August 2008)
List-Class article List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of aikidoka
(as of June 2007)

[edit] Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WPCalvinism/Article Scope}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WPCalvinism/Article Scope| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

[edit] Importance scale

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Calvinism. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are are included as sections of the main Calvinism article. A reader who is not involved in the field of Calvinism will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Calvinism
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Calvinism.
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Calvinism. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Calvinism. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in Calvinism will be rated in this level.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Calvinism. Few readers outside the Calvinism field or that are not adherents to atheism may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Calvinism, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Calvinism.

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


[edit] Assessment log

Calvinism articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Archive This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.

[edit] July 6, 2009

[edit] July 1, 2009

[edit] June 26, 2009

[edit] June 20, 2009

[edit] June 16, 2009

[edit] June 11, 2009

[edit] June 6, 2009

[edit] June 2, 2009

[edit] May 19, 2009

[edit] May 15, 2009

[edit] May 11, 2009

[edit] May 6, 2009

[edit] May 1, 2009

[edit] April 23, 2009

[edit] April 20, 2009

[edit] April 16, 2009

[edit] April 12, 2009

[edit] April 9, 2009

  • Fall of Man reassessed from C-Class (No-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Christian hedonism reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Great Apostasy reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Sola fide reassessed from C-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Free church reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Theological determinism (talk) Stub-Class (High-Class) added.

[edit] April 6, 2009

[edit] March 31, 2009

[edit] March 28, 2009

  • Huldrych Zwingli reassessed from FA-Class (High-Class) to FA-Class (Top-Class)
  • John Knox reassessed from FA-Class (High-Class) to FA-Class (Top-Class)
  • Christianity (talk) B-Class (Top-Class) added.
  • Congregational church reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Huguenot reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Presbyterianism reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Reformed Baptist reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Religion in Scotland reassessed from B-Class (No-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Synod of Dort reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Theodore Beza reassessed from B-Class (Mid-Class) to B-Class (Top-Class)
  • Jonathan Edwards (theologian) reassessed from B-Class (High-Class) to B-Class (No-Class)
  • Anglicanism (talk) C-Class (Top-Class) added.
  • Augustine of Hippo reassessed from C-Class (Mid-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Geneva Bible reassessed from C-Class (Mid-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Pilgrims reassessed from C-Class (Mid-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Puritan reassessed from C-Class (High-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Sin reassessed from B-Class (High-Class) to C-Class (High-Class)
  • Divine Providence reassessed from Unassessed-Class (Mid-Class) to C-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Fall of Man reassessed from B-Class (No-Class) to C-Class (No-Class)
  • Afrikaner Calvinism reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
  • Princeton theologians reassessed from Start-Class (Mid-Class) to Start-Class (Top-Class)
  • Johannes Brenz reassessed from Start-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Mid-Class)
  • Cultural mandate reassessed from Stub-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Regeneration (theology) reassessed from Stub-Class (Low-Class) to Start-Class (Low-Class)
  • Samuel Sewall reassessed from Unassessed-Class (No-Class) to Start-Class (No-Class)

[edit] March 24, 2009

[edit] March 20, 2009

[edit] March 7, 2009

[edit] March 2, 2009

[edit] February 15, 2009

[edit] February 12, 2009

[edit] January 31, 2009

[edit] January 24, 2009

[edit] January 15, 2009

  • Calvinism reassessed from B-Class (Top-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Five solas reassessed from B-Class (Top-Class) to C-Class (Top-Class)
  • Minuscule 69 (talk) Unassessed-Class (No-Class) added.

[edit] January 9, 2009

[edit] January 6, 2009

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Calvinism/Assessment"
Personal tools
Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs