User talk:Jayen466

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Skomorokh 111 0 1 100 13:57, 14 July 2009 4 days, 11 hours no report Davemeistermoab 69 30 4 70 03:03, 11 July 2009 1 days, 1 hours no report Fastily 51 10 5 84 00:30, 11 July 2009 0 days, 22 hours no report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Juliancolton 167 35 4 83 04:06, 14 July 2009 4 days, 2 hours no report Last updated by SoxBot (talk) at 02:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Archives
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10

Contents 1 Sent you an email 2 Thanks for the reminder 3 Thanks 4 PR 5 TerryMacro COI 6 David Cameron Image 7 Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009 8 Juliancolton's RfB

[edit] Sent you an email

Hi J, have sent you a Wikipedia-related email. Cheers, Esowteric | Talk 10:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

You may have to revert Idries Shah to an earlier version: massive quotes added; sourced material removed. Esowteric | Talk 10:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Kindly adress the issue under discussion

So far the editing seems to be appropriated by both yourself and Esowteric. Apparantly not for reasons of objectivity.

My hatchet job was not as it were unannounced on the dicussion page.

What do you have to say ?

Can we decide on a place to settle the argument ?

Lunarian (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure, let's discuss on the Idries Shah talk page. Cheers, JN466 15:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the drops of Chateau Nasrudin.

And for making the connection near at hand on the talk page.

I had read it before...time, place, people...and grapes from a greenhouse.

Cheers (c'est le cas de le dire)

Lunarian (talk) 10:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Cheers indeed! JN466 12:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the reminder

I saw your talk page reminder in the page history. It's funny, because I've been trying to get myself over to that discussion for several weeks now. Viriditas (talk) 10:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for the barnstar. That was very gracious of you. While we have had disagreements, I likewise respect the contributions you make to the project. I once saw a documentary on ants, which showed video of many ants carrying a heavy leaf. they all seemed to be pulling in different directions, but somehow the whole mass made progress towards the anthill. If ants can do it then so can Wikipedians. Cheers,   Will Beback  talk  18:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

That's a great image, and I'll drink to that. Cheers! JN466 18:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] PR

You did read them, right? :) Steve Crossin ^{The clock is ticking....} 23:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

• I'm a quick reader. ;) --JN466 23:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] TerryMacro COI

In a small effort (huge for me) of attempted civility, after crafting a response to your last statement at COIN, I decided to paste my response here instead, at least temporarily, seems slightly less combative.

Jayen, how is that comment above in any way useful, appropriate, or related to what we are talking about, or even anything other than an attack against those editors you refer to? You suggested editors with a POV should say so, several immediately have made changes to their pages to reflect exactly what you said. Seems reasonable, and now, instead of saying something to the effect of "Yes, now that other POV pushers have acknowledged themselves, it seems right that TerryMacro does so as well" (I'm sure you'd make it sound better than that), you attack those same people again anyway, and completely ignore the issue that brings us all here. Honestly, you call that good faith? NPOV? It seems a lot like some version of a red herring post to me. (If you retract your comment, please remove this one as well, thanks)

Obviously, and to be clear, I'm not threatening anything, but I will post this to COIN in response if you feel there is no reason to remove your comment. If you decide to remove it there, feel free to remove this from your talkpage as well. -- Maelefique ^(talk) 17:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your effort and have removed the comment. You are probably right; we don't need more tension, and we have a long mediation ahead of us. Regards, --JN466 18:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

It was only right and proper for you to remove the comment, Jayen, because it was extremely offensive and upsetting to me. In the future, when you have the urge to use negative innuendo against fellow editors, I suggest you provide hard evidence to back up your claims. In this case, if you do have hard evidence about someone then go ahead and bring it on. I'm not afraid of the truth. Meanwhile, perhaps it's you that should retire from the Prem Rawat articles.  :( Sylviecyn (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] David Cameron Image

Hello,

In response to the following message you left on my talk page:

"...even though the picture has been deleted and the matter is thus moot, I would be interested in knowing which blog or site you originally obtained that saintly picture from. If you recall, please drop me a note here or on my talk page. Cheers, JN466 13:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)"

... the answer is from right here:

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/05/the-cameroon-diehards-answered-though-i-suspect-theyll-just-think-of-another-excuse-to-rally-round-b.html

Regards, New Canadian New Canadian (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your reply! I actually found the picture in the end. I guess you have learnt since then that the revert of your edit made international news (!) a few weeks ago; if not, some of the history is evident from this and this deletion discussion: [1]. (The picture was temporarily restored and used to illustrate the Sam Blacketer controversy article, until that article was deleted.) Ever heard the story about the wing beat of a butterfly in China causing a storm in New York? :) Regards, --JN466 18:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Juliancolton's RfB

I responded to your statement at Juliancolton's RfB. I can provide links to various articles if you would like to see examples of his work. However, I think that the statement alone should be enough (along with the one page linked which is at FAC right now) to demonstrate that he is not confined to one tiny area. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)